Sunday, April 24, 2011

How to Write a Short Synposis for Your Story

For most writers, creating a compelling synopsis for a short story, novella or novel is a challenge. Many people pull their hair out over this. You have to compress your entire story into just a few sentences...yet you have to catch the overall arc of the plot, make the characters seem appealing, give readers an overall feeling for the story's style and tone.  This is a daunting task for even the best writers. On top of that, the thing has to be good. A powerful synopsis for a novel will make the prospective reader feel that he or she just must read the book.

How the heck do people do it? Is synopsis-writing a black art?

Well, it turns out there is a very simple, easy-to-apply formula for writing story synopses. It was developed in Hollywood and is one of the most powerful writing tools I know. It will allow you to write a strong synopsis for your story in only two sentences. Don't believe me? Read on.

First, you have to understand and agree that every story is composed of the five basic elements. If a story doesn't have any one of these elements, it isn't a story. These five elements are: hero, situation, goal, villain, and disaster.

If you string these elements together as follows, you form a synopsis:
(1) hero who finds herself stuck in a (2) situation from which she wants to free herself by achieving a (3) goal. However, there is a (4) villain who wants to stop him, and if he's successful, will cause the hero to experience a (5) disaster.
Now, before your Inner Artiste tarts screaming, "This is a formula! This is a formula!" I want to stop for a second. Yes, this is a formula, and anyone with any experience in writing (or painting or composing music, etc.) knows that formulas do not work when creating a new piece of art--the most you can hope for is a cookie-cutter type result that will be mediocre, at best. However, what we are doing here with this formula is summarizing a piece of art that has already been created.
Having said that, the only thing that is actually formulaic about this approach is the order in which the five elements are presented, and the structure of the sentences. You can change this around later and make the synopsis appear as original and unique as you desire. (Are you satisfied now, Inner Artiste? Good, now settle down!)
So, back to the method. Another way to write this compressed synopsis is to move the goal into the second sentence into the form of a question, as follows:
Hero finds herself stuck in situation from which she wants to free herself. Can she achieve goal, or will villain stop her and cause her to experience disaster?

All you have to do is identify the elements and plug them in to create a rudimentary two sentence synopsis for your own story.
The best way to demonstrate this formula is with a real example. As virtually everyone knows the story of The Wizard of Oz, let's use that. The five elements are:
HERO Dorothy, a Kansas farm girl
SITUATION Finds herself transported to faraway land called Oz.
GOAL To find her way back to Kansas
VILLAIN The witch
DISASTER To be stuck in Oz forever
Plugging the elements into the two-sentence structure, we have:
Dorothy, a farm girl, finds herself transported to a faraway land called Oz. Will the witch kill her before she can find her way back to Kansas?
Now, before you begin to think that this sounds too simplistic for your story, or if you don't believe your book contains one on more of these elements, or that they seem too melodramatic, etc.--you're wrong. Your story has all five elements, or it would not be a story.
Your story must have a hero, even if that hero happens to be a cat. And your hero must be stuck in an untenable situation and develop a goal to escape that situation, or you have nothing but a character study, not a story. The untenable situation could be something as mundane as boredom or as abstract as a blocked unconscious need to act out rebelliousness. But that untenable situation is there, and the hero must have a goal to escape it. Furthermore, if there is nothing to stop the hero from achieving her goal (i.e., a villain), then you have no conflict. No conflict, no story.
Granted, some of your story elements may require some thought to identify. For example, your villain might be society as a whole, Mother Nature, or even your hero's self-doubt. Similarly, your disaster could be little more than your hero having to live with an unbearable self-concept or overwhelming guilt. It's also important to remember that the "disaster" is seen through the eyes of the hero. This is usually the worst possible scenario he or she can envision at the beginning of the story, but may in fact be the just outcome, or the outcome that does the hero the most good in the long run.
Back to The Wizard of Oz. While the two sentence synopsis we wrote is accurate, it is also painfully dull. This because we started with the five story elements distilled into their absolute minimal forms (done intentionally by me for the purpose of this exercise). To jazz it up, let's go through the list and expand each element:
HERO - Dorothy isn't just a farm girl, she's a lonely, wistful farm girl
SITUATION - Dorothy isn't merely transported to Oz, but is whisked away by a tornado and dropped there. Also, Oz is far more than a faraway land, it's a magical but frightening place, full of strange characters, little people call Munchkins and witches, both "good" and "bad."
GOAL - Dorothy's main goal is to get back to Kansas, but she soon learns that only the great and powerful Wizard of Oz can help her do that, and he lives in Emerald City, a long and dangerous journey from her starting point (You'll note that in any story, the hero's main goal breaks down into a series of sub-goals).
VILLAIN - The witch is more than "just a witch"--she is the Wicked Witch of the West.
DISASTER - Dorothy's possible fate is actually worse than being stuck in Oz forever--the Wicked Witch of the West is determined to kill her.
So, let's plug these expanded elements into the original formula.
 
Dorothy, a lonely, wistful farm girl, is whisked away by a tornado and dropped into in a faraway land called Oz, a magical but frightening place, filled with strange and wonderful characters--little people called Munchkins, and witches that are both good and bad. Can Dorothy make the long and dangerous journey to Emerald City to see the Wizard, the only one who can help her return to Kansas, or will the Wicked Witch of the West kill her first?
Note that we still have exactly the same structure as before which does make the synopsis read a bit clumsily. But you have to admit it's a lot more colorful and engaging. For better reading flow, the first sentence can be rearranged as follows:
When a tornado strikes her home in Kansas, a lonely, wistful farm girl named Dorothy finds herself transported to a faraway land called Oz, a magical but frightening place, filled with strange and wonderful characters--little people called Munchkins, and witches that are both good and bad. Can Dorothy make the long and dangerous journey to Emerald City to see the Wizard, the only one who can help her return to Kansas, or will the Wicked Witch of the West kill her first?
Once you have this much, you can keep expanding, rearranging, and enriching the synopsis to make it as long and original-sounding as you like. You can pull in more information--for example, that Dorothy's house fell on the Wicked Witch of the East (which sets up the motivation of why the Wicked which of the West loathes Dorothy, as the two witches were sisters), and you can break the main goal down into sub-goals (for example, that Dorothy is only told that she must "follow the Yellow Brick Road" to reach Emerald City, and that once she does manage to see the Wizard, he tells her she must bring him the Wicked Witch's broom in order to prove her worthiness, and so on).
In my query letters to literary agents, I always include a two sentence synopsis similar to that above in terms of detail, then usually expand on it in another paragraph and introduce more subtle elements. In this second paragraph, I always try to point out the villain's motivation to stop the hero (as above) and also the most important character conflict. Although I did not do this above for The Wizard of Oz, the most important character conflict in that story might be between Dorothy and the wizard--after she does manage to return with the witch's broom, he gives her the runaround, and she must find the courage within herself to stand up to him and demand that he deliver on his promise.

The two-sentence synopsis method takes a little practice, but once you get the hang of it, you will find the task of writing synopses--of any length--much easier. In fact, now I often write this type of two-sentence synopsis as soon as my story idea has jelled, because the "top down" approach helps me stay focused as I begin the actual process of putting it into words.
One word of caution: if you are having trouble generating interest in your book, resist the urge to "reposition" the story to make it more appealing to agents who represent other genres. For example, if you had written The Wizard of Oz and could not get any fantasy genre agents to read it, you could compose the following short synopsis:
Transported to a surreal landscape, a young girl kills the first person she meets, then teams up with three total strangers to kill again.
I'm joking, of course, but you get the idea. Such repositioning misleads agents and wastes their time.

To see the two-sentence synopsis method applied to ten different well-known stories from literature and film, go to Story Synopsis Quiz. All ten of these synopses are written in exactly the same form as I have outlined here. To practice, you might try writing up a few from your favorite books, plays and films.

RETURN TO ADVICE FOR WRITERS PAGE

Saturday, April 16, 2011

A "Secret" Formula for Creating a Short Synopsis for Your Book

If you're like most authors, summarizing your book in a couple of sentences is a daunting task.  However, if you're going to sell your book, it's simply something you have to do.  If you choose to go the traditional route, agents and editors alike are bombarded with so many queries that if they find themselves having to do much mental work to understand the gist of your book, they will simply pass on to the next one.  The same goes for self-publishing--all the retailers and distributors require short descriptions of your book.  For example, Smashwords requires a description that can be no more than 400 characters, including spaces!  That's short, folks!
To help you do this, I want to share a formula I learned a long time ago, one that was created in Hollywood.  I can tell you from my dealings with the people in the movie industry that when it comes to stories and story structure, they really know their stuff.
Each and every story is composed of the same five basic elements.  If you can identify them in their purest, simplest forms, you will be well on your way to writing a good two-sentence synopsis of your book, regardless of its length or complexity.
The five elements are:  a (1) hero who finds himself stuck in a (2)  situation  from which he wants to free himself by achieving a (3)  goal.  However, there is a (4) villain who wants to stop him from this, and if he's successful, will cause the hero to experience a (5)  disaster
Actually, what I've just written above IS the two sentence synopsis which will work for any story, no matter how complex the plot or characters may seem.
Before I go further, I want to stop for a moment and address the "Is this a formula?" question that will undoubtedly come up in many writers' minds.   Anyone with any experience in writing (or painting or composing music, etc.)  knows that formulas do not work when creating a new piece of art, that the most you can hope for is a cookie-cutter type result that will be mediocre, at best.  
However, what we are doing here is summarizing a piece of art that has already been created.  Because we know that each and every story must contain these five elements, if we can step back from our own story and identify them, it makes the job of summarizing the story much easier.
The only thing formulaic about this approach is the order in which the information is presented, and the structure of the sentences.  You can change this around later and make the synopsis appear as original and unique as you desire.
So, back to the method.  Another way to write this compressed synopsis is to move the goal into the second sentence into the form of a question, as follows:
Hero finds herself stuck in situation from which she wants to free herself.  Can she achieve goal, or will  villain stop her and cause her to experience disaster?
All you have to do is identify the elements and plug them in to create the most basic  two sentence synopsis for your own story.  By the way, you don't have to put the second sentence in the form of a question--you could write,  She must achieve goal, or villain will stop her and cause her to experience disaster.    I posed  it as a question only because it emphasizes the main narrative question in the story--discovering the answer to that sticky issue is what keeps readers turning the pages until (hopefully) they reach the very end of your book.
The best way to demonstrate the process of creating a two-sentence synopsis is with a real example.  As virtually everyone knows the story of  The Wizard of Oz, let's use that.  The five elements are:
HERO  Dorothy, a Kansas farm girl
SITUATION Finds herself transported to faraway land called Oz.
GOAL  To find her way back to Kansas
VILLAIN  The witch
DISASTER  To be stuck in Oz forever
Plugging the elements into the two-sentence structure, we have:
Dorothy, a farm girl,  finds herself transported to a faraway land called Oz.  Will the witch kill her before she can find her way back to Kansas?
Now, before you begin to think that this sounds too simplistic for your story, or if you don't believe your book contains one or more of these elements, or that they seem too melodramatic, etc.--you're wrong.   Your story has all five elements, or it would not be a story.    
Your story must have a hero, even if that hero happens to be a cat.   And your hero must be stuck in an untenable situation and develop a goal to escape that situation, or you have nothing but a character study, not a story.   The untenable situation could be something as mundane as boredom or as abstract as a blocked unconscious need to act out rebelliousness.  But that untenable situation is there, and the hero must have a goal to escape it.  Furthermore, if there is nothing to stop the hero from achieving her goal (i.e., a villain), then you have no conflict.   No conflict, no story.   
Granted, some of your story elements may require some thought to identify.  For example, your villain might be society as a whole, Mother Nature, or even your hero's self-doubt.  Similarly, your disaster could be little more than your hero having to live with an unbearable self-concept or overwhelming guilt.  It's also important to remember that the "disaster" is  seen through the eyes of the hero.  This is usually the worst possible scenario he or she can envision at the beginning of the story, but may in fact be the just outcome, or the outcome that does the hero the most good in the long run.
Back to The Wizard of Oz.    While the two sentence synopsis we wrote is accurate, it is also painfully dull.   This because we started with the five story elements distilled into their absolute minimal forms (done intentionally by me for the purpose of this exercise).  To jazz it up, let's go through the list and expand each element:
HERO - Dorothy isn't just a farm girl, she's a lonely, wistful farm girl
SITUATION - Dorothy isn't merely transported to Oz, but is whisked away by a tornado and dropped there.  Also, Oz is far more than a faraway land, it's  a magical but frightening place, full of strange characters, little people call Munchkins and witches, both "good" and "bad."
GOAL - Dorothy's main goal is to get back to Kansas, but she soon learns that only the  great and powerful Wizard of Oz can help her do that, and he lives in Emerald City, a long and dangerous journey from her starting point (You'll note that in any story, the hero's main goal breaks down into a series of sub-goals).
VILLAIN - The witch is more than "just a witch"--she is the Wicked Witch of the West.
DISASTER - Dorothy's possible fate is actually worse than  being stuck in Oz forever--the Wicked Witch of the West is determined to kill her.
So, let's plug these expanded elements into the original formula.
Dorothy, a lonely, wistful farm girl, is whisked away by a tornado and dropped into in a faraway land called Oz,  a magical but frightening place, filled with strange  and wonderful characters--little people called Munchkins, and witches that are both good and bad.   Can Dorothy make the long and dangerous journey to Emerald City to see the Wizard, the only one who can help her return to Kansas, or will the Wicked Witch of the West kill her first?
Note that we still have exactly the same structure as before which does make the synopsis read a bit clumsily.  But you have to admit it's a lot more colorful and engaging.  For better reading flow, the first sentence can be rearranged as follows:
When a tornado strikes her home in Kansas, a lonely, wistful farm girl named Dorothy finds herself transported to a faraway land called Oz, a magical but frightening place, filled with strange and wonderful characters--little people called Munchkins, and witches that are both good and bad.   Can Dorothy make the long and dangerous journey to Emerald City to see the Wizard, the only one who can help her return to Kansas, or will the Wicked Witch of the West kill her first?
Once you have this much, you can keep expanding, rearranging, and enriching the synopsis to make it as long and original-sounding as you like.  You can pull in more information--for example, that Dorothy's house fell on the Wicked Witch of the East (which sets up the motivation of why the Wicked which of the West loathes Dorothy, as the two witches were sisters), and you can break the main goal down into sub-goals (for example, that Dorothy is only told that she must "follow the Yellow Brick Road" to reach Emerald City, and that once she does manage to see the Wizard, he tells her she must bring him the Wicked Witch's broom in order to prove her worthiness, and so on)
In my query letters, I always include a two sentence synopsis similar to that above in terms of detail, then usually expand on it in another paragraph and introduce more subtle elements.  In this second paragraph, I always try to point out the villain's motivation to stop the hero (as above) and also the most important character conflict.  Although I did not do this above for The Wizard of Oz, the most important character conflict in that story might be between Dorothy and the wizard--after she does manage to return with the witch's broom, he gives her the runaround, and she must find the courage within herself to stand up to him and demand that he deliver on his promise.
One important point about "spoilers."  Readers don't like them in synopses or book reviews, and you want to avoid them if at all possible.  But it's hard to entice readers without including some information that falls into the spoiler category  For example, in the synopsis above, the fact that we reveal that a tornado is responsible for Dorothy's arrival in Oz could be considered a spoiler--it's certainly a surprise when you experience the story the first time.  As the author, you have to use your instincts and find the right balance between giving away too much/not enough.
Also, if you are writing a synopsis for a literary agent or publishing house editor, they expect you to reveal everything, spoilers included. They don't like to be treated as ordinary readers. Without knowing all the surprises, plot twists, etc. in your book, they cannot evaluate it properly at the synopsis stage. Many of them use the synopses as a screening tool and will not read the whole book unless they know the entire story structure in advance, and that includes plot twists and other surprises.
In summary, the two-sentence synopsis method takes a little practice, but once you get the hang of it, you will find the task of writing synopses--of any length--much easier.  In fact, now I often write this type of two-sentence synopsis as soon as my story idea has jelled, because the "top down" approach helps me stay focused as I begin the actual process of putting it into words.
One word of caution:  if you are having trouble generating interest in your book, resist the urge to "reposition" the story to make it more appealing to agents who represent other genres.  For example, if you had written The Wizard of Oz and could not get  any fantasy genre agents to read it, you could compose the following short synopsis to make it into an edgy thriller:
Transported to a surreal landscape, a young girl kills the first person she meets, then teams up with three total strangers to kill again. (By Rick Polito)
I'm joking, of course, but you get the idea.   Such repositioning misleads agents and wastes their time.
To see the two-sentence synopsis method applied to ten different well-known stories from literature and film, go to  Story Synopsis Quiz.  All ten of these synopses are written in exactly the same form as I have outlined here.  To practice, you might try writing up a few from your favorite books, plays and films.

If you found this article useful, feel free to buy me a cup of coffee 😃  click here  - ☕️☕️☕️

RETURN TO ADVICE FOR WRITERS PAGE





5 Steps to Landing a Good Literary Agent

Before you begin the querying process, you should answer these questions to make sure you are prepared.
●  Is your book complete?  Literary agents know how difficult it can be for a writer to finish a novel, especially a first novel.  Querying them before you are done not only wastes their time, but yours as well (believe me, I know!)
●  Is your book the proper length?  A book-length novel is somewhere between 60,000 and 120,000 words  (this is according to the word count on your word processor).  The range is further narrowed depending upon your  book's genre (mystery, romance, young adult, etc.).   Books that are too short are difficult to publish due to paper and printing costs; those that are too long often require extensive editing, which both agents and publishers shy away from.  Before querying agents, you should research your genre and make sure your book is of the appropriate length.
●  Is your manuscript polished?  Though this should be obvious, agents expect your manuscript to be free of typos and grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.  Do the best you can do rid it of these problems before beginning your search.
●   Are you fully convinced that you need a literary agent?  If you are not completely certain about this,  it may adversely affect your attitude and come across in your query letter and other correspondence and make the task more difficult.   It took me a few  years to accept the legitimate need for literary agents and the value they bring to the  table.  To learn more about what literary agents do, read my discussion in Common Questions about Agents & Publishers.

STEP 1.  Write a Strong Query Letter

The first step in landing an agent is writing a  strong query letter.  A query letter is simply a short (preferably one page or less) letter that introduces you and your book to the agent.  It must be well written and enticing .  Bear in mind that response you get will be no better or worse than your query.  
When writing your query, it's important to note that its purpose is not to tell the agent everything under the sun about you and your book—its purpose is only to whet the agent's appetite and entice him or her to find out more;  namely, to accept your offer of sending part, or all, of your manuscript.
The basics of a good query are (not in any particular order):
●  The reason you are querying this particular agent
●  What your book is about (short synopsis, including the length of the book and its genre)
●  Your writing credits
The main problem most writers have when they first start to compose queries is one of verbosity.   The old writing adage "less is more" definitely applies here.  Agents are extremely busy people and receive voluminous numbers of queries--they want you to get to the point, and get to it quickly.  Ramble and they have the urge to say, "Just the facts, ma'am," as Dragnet's Detective Joe Friday used to say.
The heart of the query is your synopsis.  Because many writers have so much trouble with this (including me, back at the beginning of my career), I have written a helpful "how to" article on this subject which I suggest your read, unless you are one of the lucky few who can effortlessly compress the gist of your 300 page tome into a few sentences.   (See A "Secret" Formula for Creating a Short Synopsis)
Probably the best way to demonstrate the concept of brevity in a query letter is with a real example, one that worked for me, and worked well.  Here is a query I wrote back in 1998 for one of my first novels:
Dear (agent),
I am writing to you because I have just finished a novel that it similar to two other books you have sold, XXX and XXX.
WILD CHILD, an adventure-thriller, is about a 17 year old boy and girl who discover a magical substance in a cave that has amazing euphoric and healing properties...but is also severely addictive.   Soon, the U.S. government learns of its existence, and both the teens end up fighting for their survival.
Although I have not published any fiction, I did write a screen adaptation of a novel for a producer at LucasFilms, and have published over 20 business articles in magazines and newspapers.
WILD CHILD is 35,000 words long.   Please find the first 15 pages enclosed.   May I send you the entire manuscript?

Is this a great query letter?  My citing two other similar books that each agent sold certainly should have gotten the agents' attention, made the query personal for them.  Admittedly, the synopsis could have been better.  I could write a more compelling one now.  Also, I don't state that the book was a "young adult" book (the publishers made this determination after they read it).
Still, the query letter did the job.  After what seemed like weeks of painstaking research (there was no such thing as the Publisher's Marketplace online database back then), I dug up 15 agents that had sold at least two books similar to this one.   Three of the agents asked to see some sample pages, and two others asked to see the whole manuscript.  One of those became my agent for that book.  I should point out here that she never did sell it because the publishers said it was too short--you may have noted that the length was less than the acceptable range I have in my checklist at the beginning of this article.  The agent was aware of this problem, but thought the book was good enough that the publisher's might make an exception.  They didn't, but it ended up finding a market on its own (see The Wild Publication Story).
Later on, I started writing longer and longer queries, got caught up in the "everything under the sun" syndrome, and my response  rate went down.  Eventually I came full circle.  Today my queries are generally short and to the point, as in the previous example (note that the body is only about 125 words long--a half page).  
Am I suggesting you write very short queries?  No.  Am I suggesting that you follow the structure of this query as a formula?  Definitely not!  Being creative and different goes a long way towards grabbing the agent's attention.    The query above merely demonstrates that you do not have to pack your query with information to pique the agents' interest. 

As an example of a more creative query, you may want to consider the use of a "hook," something that's intriguing that pulls the agent into the letter.  For my technical thriller, THE TESLA SECRET, I opened my query with the following sentence:
On January 9th, 1943, FBI agents stormed the lodgings of Serbian-American scientist Nikola Tesla and seized all of his laboratory notebooks.
This tidbit was apparently enough to keep most agents reading, because the query generated a very good response.  I should also point out that I added this hook after I had sent out ten queries that went virtually unanswered. Sometimes you need to sharpen your arrow to get the busy agent's attention.
There are endless such hooks you can use to draw agents in to reading your letter.  This particular hook worked well because this FBI raid plays an important part in the premise of my novel.  To come up with a good hook, ask yourself what element of your story, or back story, is most unusual or intriguing and see if you can find a way to open your letter with it. 
Another crucial element of the "what your book is about"  part of the query letter is book genre, setting, and length.   I usually just state this in one sentence.  "THE TESLA SECRET is a 100,000 word technothriller that that takes place in present day Russia."  Sometimes part of this information is obvious from your synopsis, so you don't need to state it, as with the case of my WILD CHILD example above.   I state the genre (adventure-thriller) but I don't state the time or setting.  This is because if you don't state a time, agents will assume that takes place in present day.  And if you don't assume a location, they will assume it takes place somewhere in the country where you live and that the exact location is not important.  (The way WILD CHILD is written, it could take place anywhere in America).
One last note on queries--don't sweat the credentials part of the letter.  Most unpublished writers have very little in the way of fiction-writing credentials, but if they have written a good book, they still manage to land agents.  Fiction writing credits (short story publications, winning writing contests, etc.) only give agents an idea that you might be able to write a good novel.  All of them reserve final judgment until they start reading your  actual  manuscript.  If your query is well written and piques their interest, they will give you the benefit of the doubt, believe me.  Every agent I know worries about overlooking some budding author who goes on to become the next J. K. Rowling.   Most have done so at least once in the careers, and they kick themselves for it.
Once you have written your query letter, you should read 15 Common Mistakes Found in Query Letters and see if you've made any of the common mistakes.   You may want to write several versions, and when you move on to Step 3 (sending out your queries), you can try each one and see which one generates the best response.

STEP 2.  Build Your Query List

After you have written and polished your query letter, the next step is to build a list of appropriate agents to query.  The key word here "appropriate."   You only want to send your query to agents who handle the same type of book that you have written;  preferably, agents who have actually sold such books.  If your book is a thriller, for example, you don't want to query agents who only handle romance.  Similarly, if your book is non-fiction, you don't want to query agents who only handle fiction.
There are many directories and websites that offer lists of literary agents and assorted information about the agency size, years in business,  authors/books they represent, and so on.  Using these, you can go to each agent's website and look at the books that have been sold (most agents list all of them, usually sorted by represented author).
By far the best way to find agents who have actually sold books similar to yours is to use the Publisher's Marketplace Database.  This only costs $20 a month, and you can just join for one month, build your query list, and then un-join.  Their Deals database is a fantastic tool--there, you can see which agent has sold which author's book to which editor at which publishing house, along with a one-line synopsis of each book!   And it goes back ten years. (This is a good place to see a lot of powerful one-line synopses, by the way, and the current trends in book-buying).
I cannot overemphasize the importance of finding the right agents for your submission list, and for including the TITLES of the similar books they have sold in the opening paragraph of your query letter.   Remember that taking on a new, unknown author is already risky for the agent;  if the agent has little or no experience with your genre, it multiplies the risk.   This is because when it comes to selling books, each genre has a built-in learning curve.  If the agent has already sold one or two books similar to yours, then he or she  can simply put your book through the same marketing pipeline created for the previous books (the agent will already know editors at publishing houses interested in your type of book).  This takes a lot of risk out of the equation on their side.
Of course, just because an agent has not sold any books similar to yours does not mean he or she will not be interested in yours.  Sometimes an agent may want to branch out into the new genre that your book represents.  But, by and large, this is the exception and not the rule.  Most new authors secure representation with agents with experience in their genres.
Yes, I know all this agent research is a lot of work.   
Now it's time for a word of caution:
WARNING!   Please be advised that there are quite a  few unscrupulous people out in the world who pose as literary agents and prey on new authors.    The telltale sign of a scam literary agent is if they ask you, the author, for money.  
Legitimate agents make a living by taking a commission from the author's royalties before they are passed on to the author.  Monies flow from publisher to agent to author--not in the other direction.  Agents that are asking you for money up front, for any reason, are not legitimate.   Be particularly careful about agents who offer any kind of editorial service or who charge "reading fees."  A useful website that tracks unethical agencies is "Predators and Editors," located at http://anotherealm.com/prededitors/
 Legitimate agents will have a track record of selling books to legitimate publishers.   The only way to know if an agent is legit is to go to their website, look at the books they have sold, and then click through to their Amazon (or bookseller) link and check out the books.   Make sure the books are not self-published.  Also, there is a professional organization, the Association of Artist's Representatives  (AAR) to which many agents belong and which has a Canon of Ethics that its members must follow (and which prohibits their members charging reading fees, etc.), but there are some very good agents who choose not to belong to this organization as well, so it is not a perfect test (You can go to the AAR website and access their membership list for free)
Another important factor to consider in building your query list is your overall impression of each agent.  Remember, this is an individual who might become your business partner for many years, possibly for life.   As you browse through the agent database, you should go to each agent's website and ferret out as much information as you can.  You should ask yourself:  does this seem like the kind of person I could  relate to, someone with whom I feel a common connection?  Often, you can learn a lot along these lines by simply Googling the agent's name—many agents attend conferences, give talks, and have online interviews you can read.  Also, published writers often speak about their agents interviews. 
One additional factor to weigh when building your query list is your overall stylistic fit with the agent or agency.  When you look at their author list on their website, can you see yourself up there with all the rest?  Many agents have a certain "style" which is reflected in the kind of authors/books they handle.  Do you match that style?  This is important because their slant or style usually reflects the editors and publishers with whom they have the best connections.
Finally, the agent's geographic location may be a factor.  If you happen to live in, or close, to the same city, face to face meetings will be easier to arrange, which is an advantage.  Also, many writers feel that having an agent in or near NYC (or London or Sidney, etc.) is important, as many such agents regularly lunch and otherwise rub elbows with editors at the big publishing houses.  However, there are many excellent agents who are not based in NYC.  (Note:  if you want to sell your book in a country other than where you currently live and wonder about where you agent should be located, see near the bottom of my Q&A page)
Once you have your preliminary agent list, you should prioritize it based on all the information I've presented above.  I have emphasized the importance of looking at the actual number of books the agent has sold, but it is also important to remember that an agent who is selling a large number of books may not necessarily be the best agent for you.  A smaller agent who is selling a few books a year may be a better fit for you than a big shot who is selling fifty—a smaller agent will likely give you more personal attention.  Ultimately, you can only make these kinds of choices yourself.

STEP 3.  Send Out Your Queries

After you have built and prioritized your agent list, it's time to start sending out the queries.  As most agents accept email queries these days, you will be sending most of them electronically, but some may need to be sent via snail mail.  (There is more discussion of this at the end of the article).
Either way, one of the age-old questions is:  how many queries should you send out at a time?
First, it is important not to "blast" out your query to your  entire agent list all at once.  This is because there is a chance that you will need to modify your query to improve its response.  If you send your query out to your entire list and then discover that it needs significant tweaking, you've put yourself in a compromised position—when you send out your new, improved query, the agents who saw the old one will likely remember your book title or general premise, and will think, "I rejected this book already!" and it will probably end up in the trash.
As far as how many agents to query at once, some people will tell you only to query three at a time.  Of course, agents would like you to query as few of their competitors as possible.  I personally believe three at a time is far too few—I recommend querying at least ten at once.  In my experience, even the best queries typically only get a 20% response—this is because some agents simply aren't taking on new clients  or for many other unpredictable factors.   Thus, if you only query three agents, there's a strong chance that you will get no response, yet your query letter may be fine.  
Also, perhaps more importantly, you will be in a much stronger negotiating position if you have more than one offer of representation.  If you only send out a few queries at a time (once you know the query works, that is), you will likely only get one offer of representation.  Telling the agent you want to query a few more, or trying to stall while you secretly do that, is a good way to end up with no offers at all.
On the flip side, the "danger" of sending out ten queries at once is that all ten of those agents will instantly recognize that you have written the next Twilight and you will be overwhelmed by ten agents all fighting over you at once.  Needless to say, the chances of this happening are very, very slim…and in the event that you found yourself buried under an avalanche of agents vying for your signature on their representation contracts, I would say that, as a new author, that's the best problem you could possibly have.
You should, as I alluded to earlier, customize each query a little bit by writing a sentence or two about why you are querying that particular agent as opposed to others.  Agents are bombarded with "blast" queries from services that send out 500+ queries at a time, and the only way they can differentiate these from more serious queries is by the inclusion of customized information germane to their agencies.  If you have done your research in Step 2, including this information (i.e., why you like this particular agent and think he/she will be interested in your book) this should be relatively easy.  
A further way to differentiate your query from others, and increase your chances of invoking a timely and positive response, is to offer your most preferred agent an "exclusive."  This means that you are querying that agent, and only that agent, and will not query anyone else until he/she makes a decision.  This exclusive approach is appealing to some agents because it eliminates their competition for this particular book evaluation—if they like the book, they get the book.  Of course, you must also receive something in exchange for providing this "insurance";  namely, a reasonably fast answer.  Reasonably fast means a week to ten days rather than the 4 to 6 weeks that most agents quote.  Bear in mind that if you give your first choice agent an exclusive, and that agent passes, you can then move down to the second choice and offer him or her an exclusive, too.  (For more on this, see the Q&A page)
However, I should also point out that most agents are not impressed or affected by exclusive offers and will just put your query in with their normal stack.  Nothing to do about that but accept it.  
When sending out multiple queries, you should give each batch of email queries a couple of weeks before you evaluate the results (next step).  For snail mail queries, allow 10 days longer, to account for transit time.  In my experience, agents tend to fall into two categories in terms of how fast they respond to queries—either they contact you immediately (within a couple of days), or it takes them a few weeks.  This is a reflection of two styles of processing their letters—some sort through them every day, and others wait until a Saturday or otherwise slow time and dig through the pile.

STEP 4:  Adjust Your Query/Manuscript (may not be necessary)

Once you start sending out your query letter, if you don't receive what you consider to be an adequate response, you may need to rework it (see 15 Common Mistakes Found in Query Letters).  Similarly, if one or more agents ask to read sample chapters or your whole book, and then reject it, you may need to rework some parts of your novel (see A Dozen+ Reasons Books are Rejected by Agents & Editors)
There is no simple way to know when you need to do this reworking—it's one of those decisions that must be made using a combination of whatever feedback you get from the agents and good, old fashioned intuition.  Some agents respond with vague "not for us" type letters.  This gives you little to go on.  Others will provide some detail.   
For the ones who don't, there is absolutely nothing wrong with politely asking why they have chosen to "pass" on your book, explaining that you do not wish to argue with them about their decisions (please don't try this—it is a waste of time and will only make them mad), but that you greatly value their feedback because you are always trying to improve your writing.  Many agents will take the time to respond with a sentence or two explaining their reasons, and sometimes this feedback can be extremely valuable in finding a problem that can often be easily fixed.  In any case, you have nothing to lose by politely asking.
If you get a lot of rejection, don't despair!  It's all part of the process--virtually all writers go through it.  For more about this, and what to do about it, see Dealing with Rejection from Literary Agents and Publishers.

STEP 5:  Sign the Contract and Celebrate!

This is where all your hard work pays off.  If you have diligently followed all the steps above—and your book is well written—chances are that you will receive at least one offer of representation.  How long this takes, and how many queries it requires, can vary tremendously.  If you're very fortunate, you might get an offer after sending out your first batch of query letters.  However, the more typical case is that you will have to send out several batches and do at least a little adjustment of your query and/or manuscript in order to hit an agent's "hot button."  It usually takes a few months and sometimes takes years.
If you receive more than one offer, then you are in the envious position of having to choose between agents.  This decision should be made using the same factors outlined in Step 3 above.  As most agents' representation contracts are fairly standard (commission 15% for domestic sales, 20% for foreign), these details are usually not deciding points, though you should definitely look over the contract and check these numbers before signing.  (It is perfectly acceptable, and advisable, to ask for a copy of the agent's contract before making a final decision).  In general, you should choose the agent who you believe has the most likelihood of selling your book, and is a person with whom you feel you can get along in a business relationship over a period of at least several years.
I should also point out that even if a book is exceptionally well written, it's sometimes impossible to find an agent who is willing to represent it.  The world of book publishing is dynamic and finicky—at any given time, certain genres or subject matter is simply out of favor.  If this is the case with you, take heart:  if your next book finds an agent and publisher, you can be reasonably sure that your previous one will be sold sooner or later.

Additional Querying Tips

* Most agents accept e-mail queries these days, although there are a few who insist on the use of snail mail, mostly (I believe) to cut down on the number of queries they receive and to shield themselves from mass-email query services.  As dealing with snail-mail agencies is quite slow compared with those who accept emails, you may or may not choose to query them.  This element should be factored in with the rest of your agent selection criteria.
* When querying agents via email, never include attached files.  Due to the virus threat, agents will delete such messages without even reading them.  What this means is you can't attach sample pages or a synopsis.  However, what you can do is paste either or both of these into your email at the bottom, after the body of your query letter.  I always do this with the first 20 pages of my novels.  Many agents have told me that they like this—when an agent is excited by your query, the first thing he/she thinks is, "Yes, this concept sounds great…but can the author write good fiction?"  To answer this question, they do not have to waste time exchanging another set of emails asking you to send sample chapters to them.  I believe this "strike while the iron is hot" approach gives the writer an advantage.  If they like your sample pages, they will write back and ask for the whole book.
* When you are building your query list and go check out each agent's website (given that they have one), you should be sure to read their submission guidelines or requirements.  A few agents are quite strict about what they require, and some have their own submission system built into their websites that allow you to submit your query, sample chapters, etc. online.  My advice is to follow their procedures to the letter.
Good luck with your querying!

Friday, April 15, 2011

Story Synopsis Quiz

Writers, Test Your Literary Agent IQ

Test Your Literary Agent IQ

 (Answers provided below)

1.  If you feel strongly about a particular agent who posts that he or she is not presently taking new clients, you should go ahead and query that agent anyway.  True or False?

2.  Some agents who charge reading fees are considered legitimate.  True or False?
3.  To maximize your response from agents, you should tell everything you possibly can about your book in your query letter.  True or False?
4.  If you sign a representation agreement with a literary agent, that agent must represent any and all subsequent books you write.  True or False?
5.  To legally advertise their services as a "literary agent," agencies must be a member of the Association of Artist's Representatives (AAR).  True or False?
6.  One of the most common reasons first novels are passed over by agents is that the story takes too long to get started.  True or False?
7.  It is perfectly ethical to query more than one agent at a time about the same book.  True or false?
8.  If you want to see your unpublished novel made into a movie, you should query Hollywood studios and producers directly.  True or false?
9.  Depending upon your circumstances, it may be appropriate for you to seek a literary agent in a country other than the one in which you presently live.  True or False?
10.  Most agents devote a great deal of time editing their clients’ books.  True or False?
11.  It is against the AAR’s Canon of Ethics for any member agency to charge a reading fee.  True or False?
12.  Except for using their established publishing industry contacts to submit manuscripts to editors, agents provide no other tangible services to authors to justify the commissions they earn.  True or False?

Answers
1.  False.  Most agents read every query they receive, regardless of how "full" their lists are, because they can always make room for a book that really hits their hot button.  (Some agents will want to throttle me for telling you this, but it's the truth)

2.  False.  Industry consensus is that any agent who charges a reading fee is unethical.  The only people who seem to disagree with this are agents who charge reading fees.

3.  False.  Queries should be limited to one page, maximum, and should only include enough to whet the agent's appetite and make him/her want to read more. (see 15 Common Mistakes Found in Query Letters)

4.  False.  Most agencies have agreements that promise they will market your present book, but give them the right to pick and choose which of your future books they handle.  Usually the contract guarantees the agency the "first right of refusal," and if they pass on a subsequent book, you have the right to find another agent who will represent it. 

5.  True.

6.  True. (see A Dozen+ Reasons Books are Rejected by Agents & Editors)

7.  True.   If you choose to do so, some agents believe that you, as author, are obligated to notify them of this fact in your query, but most agents assume that you are making a "multiple submission" unless you indicate otherwise (see "What is an exclusive query..." under Common Questions about Agents & Publishers)

8.  False.  Hollywood rarely buys the film rights to manuscripts written by unknown authors and which have not already been sold to a publisher.  Once sold, most good agents can handle the film rights for you, but  this is something you should ask about before signing any contract of representation.  (See Common Questions about Agents & Publishers)

9.  True.  (See Common Questions about Agents & Publishers)

10.  False.  Most agents expect your novel to be in publishable shape before they will agree to represent it.  Sometimes agents will devote a significant amount of time editing and polishing a manuscript, but this the exception, not the rule.  The agent's primary functions are marketing, contract negotiation and royalty accounting.

11.  True.

12.  False.  Literary agents provide a wide range of services which justify their commissions (see 5 Steps to Landing a Good Literary Agent)

If you enjoyed this quiz, you might want to test your general novel and film knowledge with the Story Synopsis Quiz.

Dealing with Rejection from Literary Agents and Publishers

One of the most difficult aspects of becoming a successful writer if you choose the traditional publishing route--probably the most difficult-- is dealing with  rejection.  Every writer must come to terms with it, and even the most seasoned pros, those who have no reason in the world to doubt their abilities, say that rejection and criticism still cuts them to the bone.
The important thing is how you react to the rejection.  After you get past the initial emotional reaction--after you cry or yell or slam things around or have a fantasy of taking out a gangland-style contract on that pompous moron who wrote you the letter--you must ask yourself:  what will you do next? Will you let it debilitate you and discourage you from continuing with your writing, or will you use it constructively, to improve and move down the path towards publication?   
Of course one common reaction is to simply say "To hell with all of you!" and start self-publishing.  However, I would caution you about doing this, because most new authors need to learn a few things about fiction writing and storytelling before they can pen a good book.  I think it's better to play the traditional publishing game at least until agents and editors honestly telling you that they love your book, but don't believe the market will be big enough or that they don't know how to sell it.
Which means the first step in making constructive use of their rejection--letting it serve as a catalyst to positive change and eventual publication of your work--is understanding the reason behind it.  From my experience with agents and editors, rejection falls into three basic categories, which I call Type I, Skills-based Rejection;  Type II, Marketing-based Rejection, and Type III, Emotionally-based Rejection.

Skills-Based Rejection
 This is by far the most common type of rejection for new authors.  When agents  and editors receive a manuscript (or a query), they go through a logical thought process as illustrated by the following flowchart:
 The first level of rejection has to do with the author's lack of fiction writing skills.  Many writers dash off their first novel believing that they're crafting a masterpiece, blissfully unaware that there are a set of concrete and well-studied skills that every fiction writer must master before it's possible to write a good novel.   Agents and editors are well-versed in these skills, at least in terms of recognizing them, or the lack of them, when they read a manuscript.  From Page 1 onwards, they look for strengths and weaknesses in areas such as dialogue, characterization, narrative description, tension, pacing, story structure, many others.  As they receive  so many submissions, they automatically begin ticking off a mental checklist, searching for the common mistakes that most new authors make in an effort to make their weeding-out job easier.   As soon as they find one or two trouble spots, off your manuscript goes into the rejection pile.
Is this fair?   It doesn't matter.   Like it or not, this is the way things are, and you, as a writer, have to live with it.  What this  means, for those who want to see their work published, is being open to feedback and being willing to work to improve your writing skill set.
The problem with Type I Rejection is that you often don't know it when you get it, and this is no fault of your own.  Some agents and editors, bless their hearts, understand how painful criticism can be for authors.  They also aren't keen on becoming involved in an argument.  So they simply give the generic "Sorry, this book isn't for us" reason for their decision to pass, when in reality they see some problems with the writer's abilities.
 Sadly, this gives you very little to go on.   "Sorry, this book isn't for us" might really mean just that:  the agent or editor may have liked your writing but not your story, or he may have liked your story idea, but not your particular execution of that idea, or she may have simply decided the market was too small...etc.  Without additional information, you have no way of knowing, exactly.  
 If you receive a lot of generic rejections, I recommend that you write back and politely ask for a little more clarification, adding that you have no intention of arguing about it, that you fully accept and respect their decisions, but as you want to improve, you would appreciate anything they could add to clarify why they chose to pass.   Many agents and editors will take the time to write a couple of more sentences of explanation to a sincere request like this.  In any case, it doesn't hurt to ask.
If you do find out that one or more of your writing skills is weak, you must address this before you can move on.  My advice is to read fiction writing books, particularly those which address specific weaknesses (books on dialogue, characterization, etc.)  take a writing class, attend a workshop, or hire a professional writing "coach" or teacher to give you constructive feedback.
Market-based Rejection
Now, if your manuscript passes Type I rejection test and moves on to the next test in the above flowchart (Is there a market for this book?), you have a different problem, and--I'm happy to report--some encouraging news.   I'll give you the good news first:  if the agent or editor doesn't attack your writing skills, chances are high that you are writing at a publishable level.   Have a glass of champagne!  Your fiction skills are solid--the agent or editor can't find fault with them and use that as an excuse for rejection.  (Believe me, if they can use that excuse, they will). 
Your problem is with Type II rejection is that the individuals who have pass on your book do not believe there are enough readers interested in the subject matter to warrant publishing it.   For the agents, this simply means they do not believe they have a high probability of selling it to a publisher;  and for the editors, it means that they don't believe that they can convince their coworkers (in-house committee) that the company will sell enough copies to make the book a profitable project.
With this type of rejection, you must keep on querying and hope that you find some other agent or editor who feels differently.  If you exhaust all your possibilities, then you can put the book aside and write another one, having faith that perhaps at some later date, the market conditions will change (all the genres run in cycles in terms of popularity), and you can then give it another shot...reminding yourself that your skills are solid, and it's just a matter of authoring the right book.  Of course, if you sell your next book and it does well with readers, the chances of your first one being published greatly increase, because you are no longer an unknown quantity and publishers will be far more interested in purchasing anything you write.
The other action you can take in this situation is to think about the potential market for your next book before you actually start writing it, when the story is still in the idea/outline/synopsis stage.  Some writers will recoil at this suggestion, claiming that it's not "artistic," that the best ideas flow from the inside out, and not the reverse.  To this, I would say fine--I agree with you.  But what you can do to preserve this approach is let your muse generate quite a few ideas, all stories that you would  truly like to write, and then put on your marketing hat and ask yourself which one would most likely be published.  Then, you can choose to write the one that seems most salable first.  This in no way compromises your artistic integrity. 
Emotional-based Rejection
For me, this is the least hurtful form of rejection, but the most frustrating.  This is the type over which I (and all writers) feel the least amount of control.  One thing I learned early on in the writing business is that virtually no agent or editor takes on a book unless they "fall in love" with the book.  This is the exact phrase most of them use, and they relate the process of falling in love with a book very much to falling in love with a human being, something approaching romantic love.  "If I am not deeply passionate about a book," one top agent told me, "I won't take it on, regardless of how great I think the market potential might be."
Why is that?  Well, the agent went on to explain to me that selling a book to publishers--any book--requires so much time and energy that he can't muster up the drive  to do it unless he's head over heels in love with the product.  Period.  The same goes for editors at publishing houses, especially the bigger houses.  The time and energy required to push the book through the committees and garner consensus on publishing it, combined with shepherding the book through the various phases of the publication and promotion process, is just too great without the drive that sparks from one being passionate about the project.

(By the way, if you have a sales background and think this reason for rejecting a product that you might want to sell sounds pretty odd, you are not alone)
Because agents and editors receive thousands of submissions a year, they have the luxury of simply sitting back and patiently waiting for a book to come along that they do fall in love with.
What can you do about this in terms of your writing?   Is it possible to do anything that will help agents and editors fall in love with your book?   Short of traveling to some exotic land and buying a love potion to sprinkle over the pages of your manuscript, I don't think there's a darn thing you can do.   Your only choice is to try again with another book, with another agent, another editor.  This part of the querying/submission process is very much like dating.  When the chemistry happens, it just happens--there's nothing you can do in terms of forcing it.
In summary, I truly hope what I have said in this article has not discouraged you in any way.   If you step back and look at the basics, it should have had the opposite effect.  You ought to feel encouraged and more positive about how to think about, and  react to, rejection.   Once you get over the initial negative feelings, there is much you can do, using the information from the feedback, to increase your chances of having your book published.  
With the first type of rejection--given that you know it is the type you're getting--you can take action;  namely,brush up on your fiction writing skills.  With the second type, you can also take action;  you can give more consideration to the marketing aspect of books before you invest months or years in writing them.  
Of course, with the third type, the Emotionally-based Rejection . . . well, maybe that's where luck comes in.    Virtually every successful writer (and artist and musician and businessman and every other professional) will tell you that luck played a significant role at some point in their careers, and if it weren't for that little bit of luck, they would not be where they are today.
So, I encourage you to write, to hone your skills, and to give a little thought to your potential market before you actually write your book.
Never let rejection stop you from pursuing your writing dreams.

If you found this article useful, feel free to buy me a cup of coffee 😃  click here  - ☕️☕️☕️

Common Questions about Agents & Publishers

Q:  Do I really need a literary agent?
If you are going the traditional publishing route, absolutely.  
 First, let me say that there is no advantage whatsoever for me, personally, to advise you to use a literary agent to represent your work.   The only reason I recommend that you, as an author, have an agent is simply because that today's environment, I sincerely believe it is in your  best interest to have one.
As you probably know,  many of the larger publishers will not accept submissions from unagented writers.  However, even if such publishers were anxious to get their hands on manuscripts from such writers, there are several reasons that it is wise to have an agent.
A good literary agent:
- knows the current market value of a book in your genre and can get the you best possible deal
- knows which editors and publishers are most interested in, and can effectively market, your type of book
-  can hold an auction if there is enough interest in your book and get you an even higher advance 
-   from experience, knows the ins and outs of all the mind-boggling legalese in publishing contracts and can negotiate the best possible terms for you
- knows when it might be necessary to audit a publisher's books to make sure you are being paid all your royalties, and can instigate the process
- only gets paid when you get paid, taking a fixed percentage of your royalties.  The more money you make, the more money your agent makes.  This perfectly aligns his/her motivation with yours and inspires the agent to work hard on your behalf.
For these reasons, I believe a good literary agent not only saves you a lot of money in the long run by keeping people from taking advantage of you, but actually makes you far more money than you could make dealing directly with publishers yourself.  Furthermore, a good agent takes much of the "business" side of authorship off your shoulders, which leaves you with more time to write. 

Q:  What happens once I sign a contract with an agent?

First, your agent will work with you to make sure your manuscript is edited, polished and ready to submit to publishers.  Be forewarned that most agents do not involve  themselves in extensive editing--their primary business is marketing.  They usually expect the manuscript to be in good shape before they will take it on in the first place.  There are exceptions, of course--in some cases an agent may want to help mold the book into its final form.
The next step will be for the agent to develop his/her own pitch to editors.  This may or may not be based on your query letter and synopsis.  Agents believe they know how to best pitch each particular book they represent, so the author is generally left out of this process and usually does not see the marketing materials.
After the pitch is developed, your agent will begin the submissions process, often sending only a few copies out at a time to gauge the response.  If the response is strong, the agent may elect to hold an auction for the book .  More often, however, the agent will continue with the normal submissions process until either a) the book is sold, or b) all the possibilities are exhausted.  Your agent will most likely start with the largest publishers and work her way down, consulting with you on how small a press you are willing to consider.  She should share any letters from agents which give feedback on your book or reasons for rejection (often this is stipulated in your contract).
With a little luck, a good agent will be able to place your book (yes, luck is still a factor, even at the agent level).  If not, then you must decide whether or not you want to try another agency (difficult if the book has been well shopped around) and also whether you want to submit your next book to the same agency or try a different one.  You should know that many agencies have contracts which allow them to pick and choose which of your books they represent so that they are not bound to try to market something they don't believe will sell.  In any case, you should strive to maintain as amicable relations with your agent as you possibly can, as the publishing industry is relatively small and you do not want to develop a reputation of being a difficult client.
My overall advice in dealing with agents is to make the best possible choice you can in the selection process, and then stand back and this professional do her job.  Pushing your agent, second-guessing her, and annoying her with a lot of emails and phone calls will only interfere with the process of selling your book.  Ultimately, that's what you want--how she manages to do it should be left up to her.

Q:  What if a prospective agent says she'll "take another look" if I change my book in a certain way?  Should I make the changes?

This is a dice roll.  From experience, I believe the answer is:  if you honestly agree with the changes that the agent wants (i.e., you think they improve your book), go ahead and make them and resubmit.  If the agent passes again, then you can continue submitting to more agents, knowing that you have a better manuscript to send out.  If in doubt about the changes, then don't make them--just move on.  If and when you feel you have exhausted all your possibilities with other agents, you can reconsider--you may feel differently about making the changes then.

Q:  When querying more than one agent at a time, I obligated to put this in my letter?

This is a touchy issue with some agents, but in my opinion, you are not obligated to do so.  If you do not state that you are sending out multiple queries in your letter, the vast majority of agents will assume that you are.  This is because they know that any intelligent writer would inform them that the query is an "exclusive," as this gives the writer an edge over other writers submitting non-exclusive queries (see next question for more about exclusives) . If an agent has doubts about investing time into evaluating any particular submission, I feel it is his or her responsibility to ask the writer if the submission is exclusive.
Incidentally, when you make multiple submissions, if an agent asks you if you are submitting to other agents, an answer such as "Yes I am.  However, I will gladly agree to notify you and see where you are with my manuscript before I accept any offer of representation" is enough to satisfy most.   Agents simply want to be assured that if they invest the time required to evaluate your book, when they finish, you will still be in a position to seriously consider their offer.

Q:  What is an "exclusive" query and when should I go about sending one?

The terms "exclusive" or "giving an agent an exclusive" means that you are querying that particular agent and only that agent, which eliminates the agent's competition.  This allows her to freely invest time into evaluating your book because she doesn't have to worry about losing you to another agent during the evaluation process.  This should give you an advantage in their eyes, obviously, but many agents don't seem to give exclusive submissions much weight.  In any case, this approach must be used with care.  If you decide to give an agent an exclusive, she will have expected you to have thoroughly researched her and her agency, and thus will expect you to jump for joy if she makes you an offer of representation.  Any vacillation on your part upon receipt of the offer (other than asking to review the legal contract, perhaps with the help of a lawyer, and ask any questions you may have, which is prudent and reasonable), will get you off on the wrong foot and likely damage your relationship.   Therefore, when you give an agent an exclusive,  you should be 100% sure you want this person as your agent and have no doubts whatsoever about the agent's experience, credentials, or abilities. 
Having said all that, I don't recommend giving exclusives, as I feel it's just too limiting as far as your own options are concerned.  Plus, as I said, exclusive submissions from unpublished writers just don't seem to mean much to most agents.

Q:  How do I handle agencies that have more than one agent who seems a likely prospect for me?

You must query only one agent at a time within any given agency and wait until you receive a response from that agent before you move on to the next.  Some smaller agencies have a "team" approach, so a query to any agent there will be considered a query to the entire agency--you can tell if this is the case by the wording of their rejection letter.  It will say something like "After reviewing your work, we have decided..."  In the event that this is not clear, simply write back and ask if the rejection was from the agency as a whole, or just the particular agent whom you queried.  If it was just from one agent at the firm, you're free to query others there.

Q:  What if my book is long enough but it is a collection of short stories, not a novel?

Short story collections are rarely published by an author who is not already known.  This is simply because short stories are not popular with readers these days.  If you have such a collection, the best thing to do is put it aside and write a novel--once that is published, you may be able to sell the collection.  Still, having said that, it is not impossible for an unknown author to sell a short story collection--it has happened.

Q:  What if I want to market my books in another country?

This is a complicated question.  The general answer is, you should get an agent in the country where you live now and let your agent handle all foreign rights.  However, there are exceptions to this.
Before I discuss this in detail, here are a few facts you should know.
- All good agents in one country have partner agencies in other countries who can sell translation and marketing rights for all the books they represent.  Also, many agents go to international book fairs for the purpose of selling foreign rights, the annual Frankfurt and London Book Fairs being the largest two.  
- Books are rarely sold outside of one country until they sell well (to end readers) in their home countries.  Because agents and publishers naturally want to minimize their risks, they will not buy foreign rights for a book until it has proven itself in its home market, which is usually where the author happens to live. 
- Similarly, publishers only invest the money to translate books into other languages when the book has proved itself in its home country.    
- Even the largest publishers rely heavily on the author to help with the promotion of the book—in fact, as I'm sure you know, the author is the cornerstone of all promotional activities (media interviews, book signings, etc.)  Therefore, it is advisable for the author to live in the country where the book is first marketed so he/she can participate in these activities and maximize the success of the book.
Now, based on the above, things get complicated if  you have previously lived in another country and the story in the book takes place there, or if you are writing in a language that is not the main spoken language of the country where you live, and so on.
The best way to understand how all this works is to consider a few examples.  Suppose you grew up in the USA and now live in Australia.  If the book is set in Australia and has an Australian hero, probably it's best that you have an Australian agent, because the largest reader base (as a percentage of reader population) will very likely be there.  If the book does well, your agent can work through co-agents and sell rights in the USA, Canada, the UK, and all other English-speaking countries, and then perhaps sell translation rights to other non-English language markets.  However, if your book is set in the USA and has an American hero, it may be better for you to have a USA-based agent, as the reader base will probably be greater there…but you would have to consider that helping promote the book from Australia would be difficult.
Now, let's make things even more complicated.  Suppose you grew up in Morocco, immigrated to France, and later, through some bizarre twist of fate, ended up in Flottsam's Mistake, Wyoming.  Let us further suppose that French is your native language and English is your second.  If you have written a book in French about your experience of growing up as an immigrant in Paris, having a French agent might be the best choice.  This is because the largest market would probably be in France (partly due to the French language and partly due to the large Moroccan population there), and few publishers in other countries would want to take a risk on the book until it was proven in France.  However, if your book was written in English and was a romance that took place amidst the scintillating night club scene of Flottsam's Mistake,  Wyoming, an American agent would be best.  If, on the other hand, the book was written in English and based on your experience on living in Liverpool one summer (do you have a headache yet?), a UK-based agent might be most appropriate. 
If you have a complex situation like the one above--and they are not uncommon--the best way to answer it is simply to query a few agents in the relevant countries and ask for their opinions.

Q:  What if I would like to see my book made into a film?  Do I need a separate agent for that?

No.  Similar to the case with foreign rights above,  your literary agent will also handle film rights, either directly or through partner agents who specialize in that business.
Also, I should mentioned that this will take some time, and that in some cases, may never occur at all.  First, Hollywood does not buy unpublished books written by unknown authors.  In fact, they don't buy books at all—they buy screenplays, and what they buy from agents is the right to pay someone to adapt the novel into a screenplay.  Like anyone else, movie studios and producers want to minimize their risk.  If you are an unknown writer and sell your first book to a publisher, even a big publisher, the movie industry will usually wait and see how well the book does before they consider buying film rights.  There are rare exceptions.  If a book gets a big advance and the sale generates a lot of media hoopla and seems particularly well-suited for the screen, sometimes a producer or studio will feel confident enough to buy the rights before the book actually comes out (this happened with John Grisham's The Firm and Stephen King's Carrie, for example, and is part of the reasons they became mega-hits). 
But, as I said earlier, even if your book is published, and even if published by a big house, it may never be made into a movie.  Adapting a novel into a screenplay is not easy, and can be exceedingly difficult with certain kinds of stories, especially those with intense character introspection or complex subplots.   The Naked Lunch, Master and Margarita, and Don Quixote are three examples.  Also, for artistic or other reasons, some authors decide that they do not want their books made into movies at all.  An example of this case is J. D. Salinger and his classic, Catcher in the Rye.
As a final note, I believe that authors who are especially keen on seeing their books made into movies should consider adapting their books into screenplays themselves.  Having your a version of your story in the proper form (medium) will increase your chances of having it appear on the silver screen.

Q:  If I write a screenplay or a stage play, will my literary agent handle those as well?

It depends.  Some literary agencies handle both novels and screenplays, some handle only novels, some agencies that handle only screenplays, and even some that handle only stage plays.  
In any case, if your literary agent does not represent all the types of material you write, he or she will readily refer you to another agent who will rep the extra pieces.  It is to your agent's benefit for you to sell as much material as possible, as every sale gives your more credibility as a writer.  Also, there is great synergy between the publishing, film, and theater businesses.  Making a sale in one makes it easier to make a sale in the other.  Obviously, if a book or film or stage play becomes a hit, selling rights in the remaining forms is much easier, as there is a ready-made audience for the work.

If you found this article useful, feel free to buy me a cup of coffee 😃  click here  - ☕️☕️☕️

RETURN TO ADVICE FOR WRITERS PAGE