Book Gadget v0.72

Monday, November 7, 2011

Does Bruce Willis Have a Dog? Less is More



I’ll never forget the first time my wife read one of my novels.  As she was finishing the last few pages, I sat at my computer, pretending to work,  butterflies in my stomach.  Would she love it or hate it?

When she was done reading, she set the manuscript aside and gazed over at the TV set.  She seemed lost in thought.

“Well?” I said uneasily.

“Mike, does Bruce Willis have a dog?”

I was taken aback.  “Excuse me?”

She went over to the VCR and picked up the videocassette case for Die Hard, the movie we’d watched the night before. 

“In Die Hard, does the character that Bruce Willis plays have a dog?”

“Well...hell if I know!  I don’t remember any dog in the movie.”

“Exactly.  We don’t know whether he has a dog or not because it doesn’t have anything to do with the story.”

I looked over at my manuscript.  “What are you saying?”

“What I’m saying is that you could have a really great book if you did a lot of cutting.  The way it stands, the story is bogged down with too many irrelevant details.”

Irrelevant details?  What an insult!  A long, heated discussion ensued, and I viciously defended each and every word in the book.  It ended with me shouting “What the hell do you know?” and storming out of the house, vowing to never let the moron I married read another word of my writing.

But after a little time passed and I calmed down, I opened up the manuscript and started reading it myself, trying my best to be objective.  I decided there were maybe one or two places where I went overboard, explaining too much about the hero’s background and other details.  Finally I went back to my wife, apologized, and gave her the manuscript and a yellow highlighter.  “If you wouldn’t mind, I’d love for you to go through entire book and mark each and every word that you think isn’t necessary.”

“My pleasure.”

When she was done, there was so much yellow on the paper it looked like Bruce Willis’ nonexistent dog had taken a leak on it.

As a writer, this was one of the most eye-opening processes I’ve ever experienced.  What I learned from it is that if you’re writing plot-driven stories, like I usually write, each and every bit of information you include should have something to do with the story.  If it doesn’t, the words needs to be mercilessly cut.

In the famous words of William Faulkner:  “In writing, you must kill all your darlings.”

Die Hard is a very good example of how important this principle is.  In the movie, do we know if the hero (John McClaine, played by Bruce Willis) has a dog?  No, we don’t.  What about his home—does he live in a house or an apartment?  Again, we don’t know, because there are no scenes set in his home.  What about his family?  Does he have any aunts or uncles?  Again, we don’t know, because that has nothing to do with the story.

Now, in contrast, consider The Wizard of Oz. 

Do we know if Dorothy has a dog?  Of course we know this—the dog’s name is Toto.  We know it because Toto plays a key role in the story.  Among other things, it's Toto that pulls back the curtain to reveal the Great and Powerful Wizard of Oz is nothing a harmless old man hiding behind a bunch of fancy equipment.  

Does Dorothy live in a house, or an apartment?  We know that, too—she lives in a house, which is sucked up into the tornado—this is inciting incident for the entire story!  Furthermore, the house lands smack on top of the Wicked Witch of the East and kills her, which is what gets Dorothy in so much trouble in Oz.

Finally, does Dorothy have an aunt?  We know that, too. Good old Aunty Em.  Dorothy misses her terribly when she believes she’ll be stuck in Oz forever and can’t get back to Kansas.  The aunt plays a key role in the story.

So, back to the original question:

Does Bruce Willis have a dog?

In Die Hard, it doesn’t matter.

RETURN TO ADVICE FOR WRITERS PAGE

23 comments:

  1. Great post. I'm plot driven also,editor is currently asking me to slow it down, says I don't reveal enough about my Protag's motives and I need to do it through her interaction with friends, minor characters(dogs). I mention them but don't go into detail. Rewrites are making me crazy. Slash and burn is much easier. Of course, I had to do some of that also.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, I don't know what kind of a writer you are, but you certainly have excellent taste in wives.

    mood
    Moody Writing
    @mooderino

    ReplyDelete
  3. "When she was done, there was so much yellow on the paper it looked like Bruce Willis’ nonexistent dog had taken a leak on it."

    Better than rats peeing on it in the warehouse of cyberspace cause nobody wanted to read it! Ha-ha!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Great post. I'm the type of writer that feels some things are better left unsaid and left up to the reader's imagination! And just to let you know us wives are awesome!LOL! Have a great day! Oh and by the way I follow you on twitter as myuniquebaskets, throws people a curve everytime!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I thought this was brilliant...thank you. I am one of those people that writes too much and then has a hard time editing it down. I appreciate you offering that unique and well-worded bit of insight and advice. And, to echo others, the whole yellow highlighter allusion to dog pee was awesome. I'm now a fan!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Brilliant! I’m including this link on my new blog. Not advertising here just wanted you to know. I also downloaded Wild Child and can’t wait to read. We’ve been Twitter friends for a while but somehow I’ve missed your work. I’ll make up for it, promise!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Absolutely love how you drove this point home. SuzyIvy tweeted about this on Twitter, and I retweeted. Every writer should read this! If nothing else, it should make us all feel better when we realize we need to cut non-essential characters from our stories.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I laughed so hard when I read "the moron I married"
    You have an excellent way of expressing your ideas! Your books must be brilliant. Good thing your wife is such a good critic. How much does she charge?? lol

    ReplyDelete
  9. Thanks for all your comments, everyone!

    ReplyDelete
  10. This is a great post! Caught my eye because of the Bruce Willis question (I'm a big fan of the Die Hard movies). I will now probably remember this question every time I write. Although in reality my problem tends to be being too concise. I think it will help as I try to figure out what to include.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wow! This was great! Came across a tweet that sent me here. Was having a lot of trouble with my new WIP. Will also keep this in mind while writing.. Thanks much!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Very well said. A very important stage to go through and also one that can be a little painful. Something very similar happened in our house. It was so important to not develop a thick skin but to embrace all feedback as a potential method for improving the story.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Cogent post! And a pleasure to read. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  14. Great post Mike. Very amusing and all too true. My writing is very much plot-driven. Now I don't have to feel guilty about the fact that my readers don't know whether my main character has yellow or green socks on when he's hiding in a dark basement from a crazed serial killer! Thanks for the re-assurance!

    David McGowan

    ReplyDelete
  15. This was great advice. just wish my husband loved editing lol.

    ReplyDelete
  16. GREAT post :) and OH so True. But so very hard to cut those precious words

    ReplyDelete
  17. Such a great post. I am always being told I have added too much descriptive content, I think we often have so much in our minds that we want to convey we end up underestimating our readers.

    Oh and if Bruce Willis does have a dog, it would have to be something butch like a Staffordshire Bull Terrier! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  18. I am also one of those readers that find less is more. When I am reading I like to create my own picture of characters or scenes in my own mind. If the book is overly described I just skip those parts. In turn if I have to skip parts that leads me to feel like I didn't like the book.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Fantastic post, so much insightful. Great!

    ReplyDelete
  20. I needed to read this. I had someone read a draft of mine and commented that there wasn't enough description and details, but instinctively I've always felt that too much detail was a bad thing. I was torn between writing more and fluffing the draft a bit, or keeping strictly to the relevant points. Hopefully I'll be able to balance staying on point while not being too dry.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Mike: Great sight. What year did you start it?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Roy. That was back in 1997 or so.

      Delete